The Consultative Council for the Definition says that the moderate changes of the company gives priority to policy for safety

The Advisory Council for the Safety of Definition The company wrote a message About her concerns about recent political changes, including her decision to suspend the fact -verification program. In this, the Council said that the transformation of a dead policy “risks priority to political ideologies for the necessities of global safety.” It highlights how Meta’s position as one of the most influential companies in the world gives it the ability to influence not only on online behavior, but also societal standards. The company risk “normalizing harmful behaviors and undermining years of social progress … by contacting protection again for protected communities,” says the message.

Facebook Assistance center The Meta Safety Advisory Council describes as a group of “safety organizations and independent experts online” from various countries. In 2009, the company was formed and consulted with its members on issues on public safety.

The CEO of Meta Mark Zuckerberg announced the tremendous shift in the company’s approach to moderation and speech earlier this year. In addition to revealing that Meta ends its program to an external authority to define facts and implement societal notes similar to X-something, Lina Yaccarino praised X-also and said that the company kills “a group of restrictions on topics such as migration and sex that is far from the prevailing speech” . Shortly after his announcement, she changed her dead Policy of hateful behavior “To allow allegations of mental illness or anomalies when it depends on sex or sexual orientation.” It also removed a policy that prevents users from referring to women as home organisms or property and from calling transgender people or non -bilateral people as “that”.

The council says that it praises “the ongoing efforts of the dead to address the most terrible and illegal damage” on its platforms, but also emphasized that addressing “continuous hatred against individuals or societies” must remain a top priority because it has traces of ripples that go beyond its applications and websites. Since marginalized groups, such as women, LGBTQIA+ and migrant societies, are targeted inappropriately online, Meta’s policy changes can take away everything that made them feel safe and included on the company’s platforms.

Returning to the Meta decision to end the fact -examination program, the council explained that although the tools made of crowds such as society’s notes can deal with wrong information, independent researchers raised concerns about its effectiveness. One reports last year showed that the publications containing wrong electoral information on X, for example, did not show the proposed community observations corrections. They even achieved billions of views. The council wrote: “Verification of facts is a vital protection, especially in the regions of the world, where the wrong information on the Internet is fed and the adoption of artificial intelligence around the world.” “Meta should guarantee that new methods reduce risks worldwide.”