City Vs Village: The businessman collapses the cost of India in India.

If you are making 20,000 rupees per month in a village, you may live like a king. But if you earn 1 rupee of Cham in Mumbai, you can still feel shrinkage. This is the pioneers of the stark reality Akshat Shrivastava, which he drew in a virus on X of his @World account, which sparked a hot discussion on the gap that suffers from the continuous cost of living in India.

Shrivastava wrote, “If you live in a metro: Delhi, Mumbai, Pilor – the cost of living is highly high (and you will continue to rise).” He pointed out that even places such as Sharjah and Ajman in the United Arab Emirates, where entry is exempt from taxes, cheaper than the major Indian cities.

For those looking to escape the prices of heaven, the smaller cities may seem as an option. “If you live in level cities 2/3 (and you are ready to settle for the facilities), you can live in low salaries,” Sherfastava added. But even this comes with a warning. “In Level Cities 2/3: If you do not have a house-you will create a very expensive house.”

He also directed an example of his personal life to think about the direction. “I am from Jawalior: The cost of real estate is crazy. I can buy a much cheaper house on the outskirts of Bangkok than Gallor.

Users jumped to exchange their struggles. One of the commentators noted, “Some levels of level 2 are now competing with the cities of the metro in terms of land prices. Take a hometown, Gorakhpur, for example – real estate prices have increased in the past 2-3 years.”

Others were not shy of hitting the metro lifestyle. “The cities of the first level are the worst place to live in,” one of the users rose, and the problems include: “traffic congestion, air pollution, no clean water, a very high cost of living, vegetables and fish is not a new and double living space.”

On the other hand, some users defend life outside the large metro. “In Level 3 or Level 4 cities, we can get fresh vegetables – organic significantly without chemicals,” one of them wrote, “Since we have the Internet, children have the same exposure to children who grow the city.”