Captain England Jose Petrler is luxurious to the use of India for Harchit Rana as a sub -concussion in 4th T20i

England leader If Potler He expressed his dissatisfaction with India’s decision to present Harshit Rana As an alternative to concussion Chevam Dub During the fourth T20i match in Pune, which the hosts won the match with 15 runs, where they got 3-1 in the series.

A bear, which played a decisive blow of 53 running from 34 balls, was hit on the helmet by a Jimmy OortonDelivery in the final on the roles of India. After being evaluated by the medical staff and after that he did not take the field to surround England, Rana was brought as an alternative to concussion. Rana has caused an immediate impact, obtaining 3 texts for 33 runs and played a decisive role in the victory of India.

Jos Buttler criticizes replacement “like” like “

During the press conference after the match, Buttler did not agree strongly to the replacement, and questioned his commitment to International Council for Cricket (ICC) Rules to replace concussion.

“Either Shifam Duby has put about 25 miles per hour with the ball or Harchit has already improved. It is not a similar alternative, and we do not agree with that. It is part of the game; I still think we must go to win the match but we disagree with the decision.” Petler stated.

It is worth noting that the alternative instructions for concussion in the International Criminal Court states that the alternative player must be a similar alternative to the team that does not provide an unjustified advantage. However, the referee match Javajal Sarrenath He agreed to India Rana’s request as a substitute for DUBE, which led to the controversy.

Also read: Triple-Wicket Maiden: England Saqib Mahmoud achieves a unique work in T20i against India

Lack of consultation feeds frustration

Buttler also highlighted the lack of communication between officials and the management of the England team regarding the decision, while emphasizing that such a decisive ruling should have been discussed with both teams. He expressed his disappointment because he was reported to replace it only after his approval and implement it already, leaving England with no opportunity to lift the objections or request clarification in the actual time.

There was no advice. While I went out to the bats, I asked the referee about the reason for the presence of Harchit in the field, and he said it was the branch of concussion, which I was confused about my command. Petrler commented.

The accident sparked a discussion about the interpretation of the alternative base of concussion. Former Cricket players in England, including Kevin Petersen and Alesster CookHe also questioned this decision, with an emphasis on the contrast between DUBE, who is composed of all the rounded, Rana, a fast, specialized football player with a limited capacity in the Cricket T20 game.

India defends the decision

Indian bowling coach, Morne MorkelHe defended the team’s step, stressing that the decision was made only on Dubi’s health concerns. He also stated that the matter is eventually up to the referee to agree to agree to the replacement.

With a controversy that acquires momentum, the discussions surrounding the alternative base will continue to be concussion and their implementation, adding another layer of conspiracies to the continuous chain.

Also read: Internet users go to Ravi Bishnoui, Harchit Rana, lead India to a series over England in 4th T20i